A Validated Non-Aqueous Potentiometric Titration Method for Quantitative Determination of Clopidogrel bisulphate from Pharmaceutical Preparation
Rele Rajan V.*, Rane Dattaprasad G.
Department of Chemistry D.G. Ruparel College Mahim Mumbai 400016
*Corresponding Author E-mail: drvinraj@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
A simple precise, rapid accurate and sensitive non-aqueous potentiometric titration method was developed for quantitative determination of clopidogrel bisulphate from pharmaceutical dosage form. The titration was carried out using standardized 0.1 N perchloric acid. The proposed method was found to be precise with % RSD <1 (n = 6). The method showed strict linearity (r2 > 0.9999) between 20 % to 100 % of 0.100 mg of drug substance weight. The percentage recovery of clopidogrel bisulphate in the optimized method was between 100.0 to 100.416 %. The method is also found to be rugged when checked by different analysts and using different lots of reagents and different makes of titrators.
KEYWORDS: Clopidogrel bisulphate, Perchloric acid, Potassium hydrogen phthalate, Glacial acetic acid.
Clopidogrel bisulfate, chemically (+)-(S) -(2-chlorophenyl)- 6,7-dihydrothieno [3,2-c] pyridine- 5(4H)-acetic acid methyl ester sulphate is a potent oral antiplatelet agent often used in the treatment of coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease and cerebro vascular disease. The mechanism of action of clopidogrel is irreversible blockade of the adenosine di-phosphate (ADP) receptor P2Y12 and is important in platelet aggregation, the cross-linking of platelets by fibrin. The blockade of this receptor inhibits platelet aggregation by blocking activation of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa pathway. It Literature survey reveals the estimation of Clopidogrel bisulfate in pharmaceutical formulations by various HPLC1-7, spectrophotometric 8-13, methods for assay of clopidogrel bisulphate. In the proposed work simple, rapid and reliable UV spectrophotometric method is developed for the determination of clopidogrel bisulphate. The method can be used for the routine analysis. In the proposed method optimization and validation of this method are reported.
Fig. 1: Chemical Structure of Clopidogrel
EXPERIMENTAL:
Instrumentation:
An potentiometric titrator was used (Lab- India-Auto titrator ) for assay method development and validation. A Shimadzu analytical balance with 0.01 mg was used.
REAGENTS AND CHEMICAL:
Reference standard of clopidogrel bisulphate was obtained from reputed firm with certificate of analysis.
Potassium hydrogen phthalate, perchloric acid and glacial acetic acid of A. R. grade were used.
General Procedure:
Standardization of 0.1 N perchloric acid:
About 0.350 mg of potassium hydrogen phthalate (previously powdered lightly, dried at 120oC for 2 hours) was weighed accurately into clean and dry titration jar. It was dissolved in 50 ml of glacial acetic acid. It was titrated with 0.1 N perchloric acid using auto titrator. Blank determination was performed out for necessary correction. The titration was performed in duplicate. One ml of 0.1 N HClO4 is equivalent to 0.2042 gm of potassium hydrogen phthalate (C8H5KO4)
Normality of perchloric acid = W
--------------------
B.R. x 0.2042
Where W is weight of potassium hydrogen phthalate in g.
B.R. is burette reading in ml.
Quantitative determination of clopidogrel bisulphate:
About 0.100 g. of clopidogrel bisulphate test sample was weighted accurately into a clean and dried titration jar. It was dissolved in 35 ml. of anhydrous glacial acetic acid and 15 ml of 5% (w/v) mercuric acetate. It was titrated with 0.1 N perchloric acid potentiometrically. Blank determination was also carried out for necessary correction. One ml of 1 N perchloric acid is equivalent to 0.4199 g. of clopidogrel bisulphate % (Percentage) Clopidogrel bisulphate on the dried basis was calculated as below.
B.R. x N x 0.4199 x 100
% assay = _____________________________
W
Where B.R. is burette reading in ml at the potentiometric end point.
N is actual normality of 0.1 N perchloric acid.
W is weight of the sample taken in g.
RESULT AND DISCUSSION:
Determination of clopidogrel bisulphate:
The objective of this work was to determine accurately the content of clopidogrel bisulphate. The assay of clopidogrel bisulphate (on the dried basis) of various batches of clopidogrel bisulphate test sample was analyzed using the above method. It was in the range of 99.00 % to 100.68 %.
Analytical Method Validation:
The method precision was checked after analyzing six different preparations of homogeneous test sample of clopidogrel bisulphate. The % RSD of results obtained was found to be 0.7516. It confirms good precision of the method. The results are presented in table 1.
Linearity:
For the establishment of method linearity ,five different weights of clopidogrel bisulphate test samples corresponding to 20 % ,40 %, 60 % , 80 % and 100 % of the about weight ( 0.100 g. ) were taken and analyzed for % ( percentage) of clopidogrel bisulphate content. The results are in table 2.
Table no. 1: Method of precision
|
Sr. no |
Weight of clopidogrel bisulphate |
Burette reading in ml |
Normality of perchloric acid |
% assay |
|
1 |
0.500 |
11.9 |
0.09990 |
99.84 |
|
2 |
0.500 |
12.0 |
0.09990 |
100.68 |
|
3 |
0.500 |
11.8 |
0.09990 |
99.00 |
|
4 |
0.500 |
12.0 |
0.09990 |
100.68 |
|
5 |
0.500 |
11.9 |
0.09990 |
99.84 |
|
6 |
0.500 |
11.8 |
0.09990 |
99.00 |
|
|
|
|
Mean |
99.84 |
|
|
|
|
Std. Deviation |
0.75 |
|
|
|
|
RSD |
0.7516 |
Table no.2 : Linearity
|
Sr. No. |
Weight of lopigrel bisulphate |
Burette reading |
Normality of Perchloric acid |
% assay |
|
1 |
0.1 |
2.37 |
0.09990 |
99.417 |
|
2 |
0.2 |
4.77 |
0.09990 |
100.046 |
|
3 |
0.3 |
7.15 |
0.09990 |
99.976 |
|
4 |
0.4 |
9.51 |
0.09990 |
99.731 |
|
5 |
0.5 |
12 |
0.09990 |
100.675 |
|
|
|
|
Mean |
99.969 |
|
|
|
|
Std. Deviation |
0.465 |
|
|
|
|
RSD |
0.465 |
The potentiometric titration was conducted once at each level. Linearity curve was drawn by plotting test sample weight in gram on x axis and titre values on y axis.
The values of correlation coefficient, slope and intercept are given in table 3.
Table no.3: Regression values
|
Parameter |
Values |
|
Slope |
24 |
|
Intercept |
-0.04 |
|
Coefficient of co-relation |
0.9999 |
ACCURACY AND RECOVERY:
Accuracy was determined at five different levels i.e., 20 % ,40 % ,60 % ,80 % and 100 % of the nominal concentration. (0.100 g.) The titration was conducted in triplicate at each level and the titre value was recorded. The tire value obtained in linearity study was considered as true value during the calculation of percentage (%) recovery. The percentage recovery is calculated using following equation.
Titre value x 100
Percentage recovery = ---------------------------
True titre value
The percentage range recovery of clopidogrel bisulphate was in 99.417 to 100.396 %. It confirms the accuracy of the proposed method. (Table 4).
Table no 4 : accuracy and precision
|
Level no. |
Weight of clopidogrel bisulphate added |
Weight of clopidogrel bisulphate found |
% assay |
Mean % assay |
|
1 |
0.10 |
0.0998 |
99.836 |
99.417 |
|
0.10 |
0.0994 |
99.417 |
||
|
0.10 |
0.0990 |
98.997 |
||
|
2 |
0.20 |
0.1997 |
99.836 |
100.046 |
|
0.20 |
0.2005 |
100.256 |
||
|
0.20 |
0.2001 |
100.046 |
||
|
3 |
0.30 |
0.2999 |
99.976 |
99.976 |
|
0.30 |
0.2995 |
99.836 |
||
|
0.30 |
0.3003 |
100.116 |
||
|
4 |
0.40 |
0.3993 |
99.836 |
99.731 |
|
0.40 |
0.3989 |
99.731 |
||
|
0.40 |
0.3985 |
99.627 |
||
|
5 |
0.50 |
0.5034 |
100.675 |
100.396 |
|
0.50 |
0.4992 |
99.836 |
||
|
0.50 |
0.5034 |
100.675 |
RUGGEDNESS:
The ruggedness of the method is defined as degree of reproducibility of results obtained by analysis of clopidogrel bisulphate sample under variety of normal test conditions such as different laboratories, different analysts and different lots of reagents. Quantitative determination of clopidogrel bisulphate was conducted potentiometrically on one laboratory. It was again tested in another laboratory using different instrument by different analyst. The assays obtained in two different laboratories were well in agreement. It proved ruggedness of the proposed method.
CONCLUSION:
The proposed method of non-aqueous potentiometric titration was found to be precise, accurate and rugged. The values of percentage recovery and standard deviation showed sensitivity. The method was completely validated. It showed satisfactory data for all the parameters of validation. Hence it can be applied for routine quality control application.
REFERENCES:
1. Mohamad Ammar Al‐Khayat, Samer Haidar, Huda Mando, Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Rev. Res.14(2); 2012: 1‐5.
2. Nawal A. Alarfaj, Journal of Saudi Chemical Society. 16; 2012 : 23-30.
3. Dr. U. C. Mashelkar , Sanjay D. Renapurkar , International Journal of Chem. Tech Research. 2(2); 2010: 822-829.
4. Ajay Kumar Gupta, P. K. Patel , international journal of scientific research. 3(2); 2014: 59-60.
5. A. Mounika, N. Sriram, International Journal of Pharmacy and Analytical Research. 1(1); 2012: 1-7.
6. Rajan V Rele, Advance Reverse Phase High Performance Liquid Chromatography Method for Determination of Clopidogrel in Pharmaceutical Formulation. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research. 6(12); 2014 :672-676
7. Rajan V Rele, Determination of clopidogrel bisulphate in pharmaceutical dosage form by high performance liquid chromatography method, Der Pharmacia Sinica. 6(1); 2015:26-30.
8. B. Anupama, V. Jagathi, A. Aparna, M. Madhubabu, V. Lakshmi Annapurna, International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences. 2(2); 2011: 105-108.
9. Chaudhari Pritam B., Pawar Pravin D. Narkhede Kiran P., International journal of research in ayurveda and pharmacy. 1(2); 2010: 418-423.
10. Saadet Dermiş, and Ekrem Aydoğan, Commun. Fac. Sci. Univ. Ank. Series B. 55(1); 2009: 1-16.
11. Pravin B. Cholke , Raihan Ahmed, S. Z. Chemate and K. R. Jadhav, Archives of Applied Science Research. 4 (1); 2012: 59-64.
12. Suhas Gurav, R. Venkatamahesh, International journal of Chem. Tech Research. 4(2); 2012: 497-501.
13. Rele Rajan V. Development and validation of second order derivative methods for quantitative estimation of clopidogrel in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage form Der Pharmacia Lettre, 6 (6); 2014: 117-121
Received on 24.12.2016 Modified on 05.01.2017
Accepted on 27.01.2017 © AJRC All right reserved
Asian J. Research Chem. 2017; 10(1):26-28.
DOI: 10.5958/0974-4150.2017.00004.9